If freedom of speech is absolute, how come it's not applied for private spaces and for the Internet?
10.06.2025 03:43
HIPAA violations
Revenge porn
Threats of violence
Fraud
Perjury
No freedom is absolute.
Costco makes key moves to protect prices from tariffs - TheStreet
Freedom of speech does not apply to:
Insider trading
False advertising
Measles Exposure Prompts Health Warning In Bay Area - Patch
You have freedom to travel. If I loan you my car, I can tell you not to take it out of town, because it’s mine, you have no right to use it, and if I give you permission to use it I can tell you what you can and can’t do with it.
Child pornography
Insurrection
Trade secrets
Revealing classified information
Terroristic threats
Conspiracy
That’s what it is. You have no right to use other people’s stuff. If people let you use their stuff, they can tell you how you can use it, and they can tell you to stop using it any time they want.
And much, much more.
What is so great about Jiraiya?
If you’re wondering why free speech doesn’t apply to the internet, it’s because you have no right to use other people’s stuff for free.
You have freedom of speech. If I loan you my computer, I can tell you not to use it for certain things, because it’s mine, you have no right to use it, and if I give you permission to use it I can tell you what you can and can’t do with it.